By Casandra Perez Murena In a recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court confirmed that a Receiver has standing to bring..
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.receiversreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/fradulent_transfers.jpeg?resize=600%2C600&ssl=1)
By Kenneth Dante Murena and Jonathan E. Groth In accordance with Section 1367(a) of Title 28 of the United States Code, a U.S. District Court..
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.receiversreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ReceiverRepoprt_Image2.jpeg?resize=800%2C500&ssl=1)
Ponzi Scheme Trustee Has Standing to Pursue Recovery Claims, and Is Not Barred by in Pari Delicto Doctrine, in Sixth Circuit, Which Joins Third, Eighth and..
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.receiversreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ReceiverRepoprt_Image4.png?resize=600%2C750&ssl=1)
Adverse Domination Doctrine Under the adverse domination doctrine, the statute of limitations for bringing an action against the corporate wrongdoers is tolled when those wrongdoers..
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.receiversreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ReceiversRepoprt_Imag8-scaled.jpeg?resize=600%2C650&ssl=1)
As set forth in Scholes v. Lehmann and adopted by courts across the country, a Receiver has standing to pursue fraudulent transfer claims because the receivership..
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.receiversreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ReceiversRepoprt_Imag9.jpeg?resize=700%2C394&ssl=1)
Most court have adopted the traditional view that a receiver stands in the shoes of the entity that has been placed in receivership such that..